Monday, 4 January 2016

First Draft of Critical Investigation

Do music videos like ‘Anaconda’ by Nicki Minaj empower or objectify women in the music industry?
Despite the efforts made for feminism over the past years, the stereotyped portrayal of women as sex objects is still a topic to be discussed in the music industry. Women are still shown in such a manner in music videos and people say that women are being pressured to follow the status-quo and view the portrayal as the norm. Many blame the hip-hop, R’n’B genre for continuously representing women so negatively in music videos. However, things have evolved now as the portrayal is now viewed as powerful. There are many female artists who portray themselves in such a manner in their music videos. A clear illustration of this would be ‘Nicki Minaj – Anaconda’ which was named one of the sexiest music videos of 2014 by VH1. Similarly, artists such as Katy Perry, Rihanna and Jennifer Lopez are represented as empowering female artists when they sexualise themselves in their music videos. It is evident that the mentality of how women present themselves has changed when comparing it to the music industry years ago. Potentially, this will affect the future generations as they will expect women to have ‘perfect’ bodies and to sexualise themselves which can have a negative effect towards younger girls. This essay will explore the representation of women in music videos so as to see if what would have seemed to objectify women decades ago is what empowers women in today’s generation due to the normality of the representation of women.

In August 2014, Nicki Minaj released the music video for her song Anaconda which shocked the nation. Upon release, the music video received both good and bad reviews. Critics from the national review described the song “as ‘degrading’, promotes prostitution and drug abuse and promotes immorality to young girls” [[1]] and is a “violation of [a] women’s dignity” [[2]]. However, some claimed that “the video is about Nicki asserting her power, not as a sexual object but a sexual subject” [[3]].

During the scene between 3:03- 3:23 of the music video, Nicki Minaj puts more emphasis on the fact that she is sexualising herself and making herself look seductive as she is seen in a kitchen slowly eating a banana and a strawberry with whipped cream; both representing the connotation of someone being seductive. At that moment, the video is slowed down and Nicki Minaj's facial expressions suggest she is confident as she wears revealing clothes and stares straight at the camera in a direct mode of address. Whipped cream is then spread all over her chest and butt indicating to the audience to focus on these areas of her body. The clip then increases in speed as the scene continuously changes from her with whipped cream everywhere, to a banana rapidly turning to her again twerking in the kitchen. The fast close ups clips of Nicki smothering whipped cream and long shots of her in the kitchen twerking gives the audience the overall view that Nicki Minaj is confident about being sexy. She even states this herself: “There are sexual things that I do that aren't for a man. I feel empowered sometimes by being sexy and being comfortable enough to be sexy on camera.” [[4]] This part of the music video suggests that men would be the primary audience due to the level of sexuality shown which shows that the male gaze (Mulvey) is presented. Many where shocked to see such explicit content and it caused a moral panic (Cohen) as people, mostly parents, found this as a threat to society as the music video portrayed women in such a way that parents do not want their children to imitate.

However, Nicki, along with a few others, found the music video as normal and empowering. In fact Nicki stated that it was important to do “the kitchen scene, because it’s always about the female taking back the power, and if you want to be flirty and funny that’s fine, but always keeping the power and the control in everything.”[[5]] At the end of the music video, Nicki is seen dancing on rap artist Drake but what was significant about the scene was the fact that it can be argued that Nicki Minaj is trying to assert power as Drake sits down helplessly as Nicki Minaj confidently flaunts herself around him. She then removes his hand from her butt to show she is in control of her body and walks away. In Nicki’s view: “women should be allowed to be as hardcore and sexual as we want, because men do it all the time”. [[6]]  However, we cannot neglect that Nicki’s lyrics and video content is not what everyone wants to hear or see giving the music video an oppositional reading (hall). But is the reason why some viewed the song as normal because it’s how women empower themselves now?

If we go back to early 70s we can definitely see the difference of the way in which women presented themselves in music back then compared to today. Helen Reddy’s song “became an enduring anthem for the women’s liberation movement” [[7]] as the song uses effective lyrics such as “I am strong (strong) I am invincible (invincible) I am woman”. The song has no sexual reference at all and although there is no official music video on YouTube, live videos that were available showed that Helen was dressed modestly and the main focus was on her lyrics and the liberal values she was promoting. Back then, it would have been shocking to see women sexualise themselves and wear revealing clothes to display power and feminism. At that time, it would have been degrading to see a women do such things.

Things started turning in the 90’s when male artists began to develop the stereotype of women being “shown in such a sexual and perfect way”. [[8]] The Thong Song by Sisqo “drew minor criticism for exploiting women as sex objects, and was credited for starting a new wave of "booty" videos” [[9]] as the song repetitively says “baby move your butt butt butt”. In the music video, the women are dressed in a seductive manner and there are low angle shots so that the audience can have an exaggerated view on their butts and high angle shots for their chest. Male artists began to follow the trend and were then criticized for degrading women in such a way. However, female artists were slowly starting to follow the trend themselves.

In 2001 Kylie Minogue released the song Can’t Get You Outta Head which turned out to be a success. People “described Minogue's vocals as a "sexual come on"” [[10]] which can also be seen through her music video. Even though Kylie’s main focus wasn’t her butt, she still wore a revealing dress that gave the audience the opportunity to see her cleavage. Also, her lyrics weren’t as sexual as Nicki’s because she focuses more on her image. It is clear that “the conception of white female sexuality inscribed in and through Minogue’s body differs little from the one which emerged out of Victorian and colonial discourses” [[11]] as she conveys a different look on female sexuality.

The song Milkshake by Kelis continued the trend of female artist becoming more sexual in 2003. Despite the level of sexual connotations in the music video, the song received a lot of positive views. Milkshake can be described as similar to Anaconda because both songs share sexual content in both music videos and lyrics. Kelis, in her music video, behaves very seductively whilst she wears a top that shows a bit of cleavage. She prances around the diner biting cherries in a seducing manner. Her lyrics also gives of a sexual vibe suggesting that she holds some sort of sexual power to bring all the boys towards her just as Nicki tries to present herself in Anaconda. This clearly shows that by 2003, people wear getting used to the idea of women portraying themselves in a sexual way and using the male gaze (Mulvey) as a way to gain popularity. However, she relates the sexuality to confidence as “she likened one's milkshake to one's self-confidence; "A milkshake is the thing that makes women special. It's what gives us our confidence and what makes us exciting”. [[12]]

Finally we have Madonna who “is seen to variously defy, challenge and redefine hegemonic representations of femininity”. [[13]] In 2005, the song Hung up was released and the music video Madonna wore a slightly revealing outfit but the lyrics and overall content of the music video wasn’t sexual compared to the music videos we see today. However, during that period Madonna was “the female star who perhaps more than any other embodies the new postmodern feminist heroine in her odd combination of seductiveness and a gusty sort of independence”. [[14]] It is said that “she made it possible to articulate feminist ideas in an accessible (or indeed sexually provocative) way and thus paved the way for, and empowered, a younger generation of female performers” [[15]] Following from Kelis’s music video, Madonna introduced the mentality of women feeling confident as she sexualises herself. “While boys enjoyed looking at Madonna as an object of sexual desire, they were perturbed by the confidence she expressed in her own sexuality” [[16]] showing that Madonna’s target audience was not only for men but also for women so that they may learn to empower themselves as she does. Overall, this suggests that society and women in music has evolved to showing sexual motives in both music videos and lyrics with the purpose of empowering themselves and motivating the audience to imitate their mentality and to view it as a feminist ideology. The past 15 years show the ‘degradation’ of standards or as some female artists view it, the liberalisation of the media.

As for the discussion of where the stereotype of women came from, many lean towards the hip-hop genre as the ones who created it. “Some say women in hip-hop videos are adornments much like jewellery, nothing more than walking bling”. [[17]] This is because of the way women are presented in most hip-hop music videos and the way they, male rappers especially, describe women in their songs. This started a moral panic (Cohen) as studies showed that “young women who watched hip-hop music videos were more likely to be accepting of teen violence”. [[18]] But is only the hip-hop genre that encourages the female stereotype in music?

Recently, “pop music has been labelled ‘un-feminist’ and criticised for being one of the many factors that perpetuate misogynist views of women”. [[19]] Kitty Empire a music critic for The Observer says “pop is where the tectonic plates of sex and commerce rub up against each other most vigorously”. [[20]] An example of this would be the song Bang Bang sang by Jessie J, Nicki Minaj and Ariana Grande. Throughout the song, the three female artists are seen bragging about their sexual prowess. In the music video, the girls are shown singing to the song in quite revealing costumes. Also, the colour pink was largely pronounced in the music video so as to promote feminism and female empowerment. The song “represents a fairly significant power shift in pop music — women are in complete and total control of their sexualities while men have become the objects of desire.” [[21]] We can see liberal values have changed because it is now normal “to hear women talking so openly about sex in a pop song — the way men have been "allowed" to talk about sex in music for years”. [[22]]

It can also be said that for the past 40 years, rock music lyrics have become increasingly explicit when referencing about sex and “only 14% presented women as fully equal to men” [[23]] in music videos. Whilst country music also casts women in gender roles, “heavy metal and "gangsta rap" music lyrics have elicited the greatest concern”. [[24]] If we look to the other side of things, is it not the artist who choose to follow the trend of sexualising themselves because despite female pop artists becoming more sexual, there are artists such as Adele who are classified as not overly sexualised artist because she is “focusing on her music rather than her sexuality”. [[25]]

Furthermore, many would agree that representations are overwhelmingly created by men as they continuously objectify women in their music videos. Many of their music videos portray “men as the characters with “power and dominance, and women as passive recipients of their ‘gaze’”. [[26]] One example of this would be the song Blurred Lines by Robin Thicke. Despite the song overall was successful in being no. 1 in the charts, it received a lot of negativity due to the manner in which the song seemed to degrade women. The song's music video was released in two versions, with one featuring three models being topless, while the other censored nudity. The censored music video had the models in revealing outfits as the dance around and the guys flirt, follow and touch them. It was also “proved controversial with some groups, with claims that it is misogynistic and promotes date rape.” [[27]] This was due to the lyrics that was used in the song, for instance, Thicke sings “I know you want it” “a phrase that many sexual assault survivors report their rapists saying to justify their actions”. [[28]] It is a common phrase that male artist use in their music videos when conversing with a female, for example, Sisqo sang in the Thong Song “Girl I know you wanna show” which gives the assumption that she wants it without actually asking her. Many feel that Thicke’s song is about forcing a woman to perform both the good girl and bad girl roles so as to satisfy the man’s desires which promotes the rape culture.

However, songs like Face Down by Meek Mill are released without people giving so much negativity. In the music video, the women’s faces are not shown much because the camera focuses on their body features. The guys on the other hand are shown rapping with money in their hands as they watch and touch the girls and throw money at them suggesting that they are strippers. The sexual objectification in the song “refers to the idea that women are good only for sex”. [[29]] On examining YouTube comments regarding the song, one said that they ‘can't believe more women aren't offended by music like this’, while another said ‘It's crazy how women accept this kind of music’. Considering the facts, it can be concluded that degrading and portraying women in a sexual provocative way is “the currently most honored way of being a man”. [[30]] They represent themselves as powerful and portray the stereotype to the audience through their music and people are now viewing it as normal because they are viewed as powerful male artist and people in power seem to stereotype those with less power (Dyer), in this case women. While this is the case, male artists are influenced by pressures from elites in the music industry persuading them that the only way to maximize sales is to record provocative, edgy lyrics. Most evidence suggests that rappers whose songs present women negatively are influenced by three major social forces: “larger gender relations, the music industry, and local neighbourhood conditions.” [[31]] Because of this, “women are seen as sex symbols that simply must have sex and will submit to any fantasy that a man may have.” [[32]] Now female artists are being pressured to present themselves as the representation portrays them.

The media in general seems to be able to pressure women to act in a certain way. Society has made it clear, through media magazines, that women are most attractive when they wear less and show off their assets therefore, it has become a normal thing to see women sexualise themselves. We have been “dumbed down” (Keen) to accept this fact as the media promotes hegemonic ideology that we are forced to act in accord with which shows that the media, through the music industry in this case, is like a hypodermic needle feeding us their dominant ideologies. From a Marxist feminist perspective, the media is trying to reinforce the stereotype of women being “depicted as existing primarily for the sexual satisfaction of others (usually men) and as willing to accommodate any and every male advance”. [[33]]

It can be seen that female artists such as Lil’ Kim, who calls herself ‘‘Queen B****, “adopt the persona and status afforded [to] them by men” [[34]] and the media causing them to sexualise themselves “in order to maintain status and popularity”. [[35]] People seem to be more incline to watch a music video where a women acts in a provocative manner. It is not only men who enjoy watching women as Mulvey suggests but, as suggested by Berger, women watch themselves being watched indicating that even women watch themselves being seductive. Therefore, many sexualise themselves today so as to conform to the status quo and to gain viewers.  Also, “the inclusion of sexual content in music videos in as important marketing tool” [[36]] hence why female artists today feel “pressured from all points on the Cultural Diamond to overemphasize sexuality in the early stages in their careers”. [[37]] However, many claim that today, many “female artists are degrading themselves and other women in their own videos, as if an attempt to embody the male rapper persona” [[38]] insisting that it is empowering to be classed “the man”.

To elaborate, it seems that the definition of power has changed from what it was decades ago. From a female prospective, in the 21st century, women feel empowered by their sexuality. There are now many female artists who show confidence and power in their music videos by being sexual. For instance, not soon after Anaconda came out, Jennifer Lopez released Booty featuring Iggy Azalea. The music video instantly starts off with Lopez and Azelea both clad in skimpy, cleavage-bearing bathing suits, colliding their buttd with one another and twerking. A majority of the clip features a ton of booty twerking, spanking, and a seductive scene where JLo is rubbing oil around her butt. The video is also shown in a fast paced montage of Iggy and J-Lo’s butts as they twerk and dance. Alexa Camp of Slant Magazine described the song's lyrical content as "a tribute to ladies who are, uh, 'booty-full'” [[39]] and Lopez herself stated that “it's about owning everything about you and who you are, and embracing that”. [[40]]

Rihanna is also a female artist known for taking risks in her music and representing herself as a powerful woman. In 2010, her song Rude Boy was released which was an oppositional reading towards the dominant ideology as she presents herself as the one in charge in the relationship as she sings “I'm a let you take me higher” suggesting she has the power and is allowing him to take her higher.

Katy Perry’s song California Girls also demonstrated that she uses her sexuality to exert power. In the music video, Katy is seen naked with candy covering parts of her body. At the end she destroys the gummy bears by squirting cream that were attached to her boobs suggesting that her sexuality is what makes her powerful. The song however was claimed to represent California.

“Close-up shots of individual body parts, self-touching of sexual body parts, ample skin exposure, or sexualized dancing” [[41]] are what use to be indicators of sexual objectification but now when people see these action codes (Barthes) they would view is as an indication of sexual empowerment. It appears that “female artists [are] even more likely to objectify themselves than male artists […] objectify female characters in their music videos” [[42]] so as to take on the male role. For example, looking back at the song Bang Bang, “it employs one of the most offensive phrases from Thicke's "Blurred Lines," "I know you want it," as if to say, "Listen up, dudes! You've been claiming to know what women 'want' in pop music for years — now it's our turn” [[43]] This shows binary opposition (Levi-Strauss) between masculinity and femininity as women are now portraying themselves more powerful than men by using liberal values and suggesting women should be allowed to express themselves as equally as men. Nicki made an interesting statement when speaking about her song Anaconda as she says “if a man did the same video ['Anaconda'] with sexy women in it, no one would care”. [[44]]

 According to today’s generation, women no longer want the status of being the princess (Propp) and this can be seen with the recent yet popular song Worth It by Fifth Harmony. It is written from the perspective of a woman telling a man that she's "Worth It", applying sexual connotation. However, the song can be viewed as a feminist anthem, as it encourages "young girls to truly believe they're 'Worth It' and can own Wall Street or any other place on which they set their sights". [[45]] This latter view of the song is highlighted in the music video. In the music video, in the background “phrases like "feminism is sexy" and "women in power" scroll across the NASDAQ-style ticker.” [[46]] The girls definitely go “straight to the "dominate men" level” [[47]] when making this music video.

All these factors discussed can contribute to the future, how women will be viewed and the ways it will affect the audience.  The outcome is, “continued exposure to this kind of representation of women may result in the acceptance of women in a subordinate sexual role and ultimately lead to behaviours that reflect this perception”. [[48]] Since it is now viewed as the norm to see women sexualise themselves, younger ones would grow up with the mentality that women are supposed to present themselves in such a way. Younger girls will view that as the only way to feel powerful feminist. Studies have shown that “children exposed to such stereotypes tend to have a more restricted view of appropriate sex roles than those exposed to counter-stereotypical representations”. [[49]] Not only can it change the way the younger audience view gender roles, but it can also have a “negative consequences for the mental, emotional, and sexual health of youth, especially adolescent girls and young women” [[50]] as they believe that if they do not look or present themselves in such a manner that might bring discomfort to themselves, they are neither powerful or attractive young girls. It can be said that in the near future, music videos won’t be relevant due to new and digital media. People would be more interested in downloading songs rather than watching music videos. However, today, music videos are increasingly available besides pervasive “due to the ubiquity of music videos on websites such as YouTube and multiple viewing platforms, including mobile phones, portable digital video/ music players, and computers”. [[51]] Therefore, all the representations given by both male and female artist for women, will have an effect and change the way women are viewed in the future.

 To conclude, due to the change of feminism over the past decade or so, to some extent, what would have seemed to objectify women in music industry in the 1900s is what empowers women in the 21st century due to the normality of the representation of women. From a feminist perspective, women are able to sexualise themselves and feel empowered and it won’t be seen as sexual objectification as it is coming from a female’s point of view. Rosalind Gill states that the “shift towards women’s freely chosen self-objectification fits very well with broader postfeminist discourses which present women as autonomous agents no longer constrained by any inequalities of power imbalance, who can somehow choose to “use beauty” to make themselves feel good”. [[52]]

2690 in total excluding quotes

3629 in total


Bibliography


 

Academic papers


Weitzer, R. & Kubrin, C. E., 2009. Misogyny in Rap Music A Content Analysis of Prevalence and Meanings. Men and Masculinities, pp. vol.12 no.1 3-29 .

Cooper, V. W., 1985. Women in popular music: A quantitative analysis of feminine images over time. Sex Roles, pp. Volume 13, Issue 9, pp 499-506.

Family, A. F. f. t., 1996. Pediatrics. Impact of Music Lyrics and Music Videos on Children and Youth , pp. p.1219-1221.

Railton, D. & Watson, P., 2005. Naughty Girls and Red Blooded Women. Feminist Media Studies, pp. 51-63.

Jennifer Stevens Aubrey, K. M. H. W. G. M., 2011. Check That Body! The Effects of Sexually. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 3(55), pp. 360-379.

Wallis, C., 2011. Performing Gender: A Content Analysis of Gender Display in Music Videos. Sex Roles, pp. Volume 64, Issue 3-4 , pp 160-172 .

 

Websites

Anon., 2014. Representation of Women in Music Industry. [Online]
Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qT5KkR1ttgc

Anon., 2014. The Root. [Online]
Available at: http://www.theroot.com/articles/culture/2014/08/music_videos_condemned_for_portraying_black_women_as_wild_and_hypersexual.html

Anon., n.d. Bang Bang (Jessie J, Ariana Grande and Nicki Minaj song). [Online]
Available at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bang_Bang_(Jessie_J,_Ariana_Grande_and_Nicki_Minaj_song)
[Accessed 29 12 2015].

Anon., n.d. Hung up. [Online]
Available at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hung_Up
[Accessed 01 01 2016].

 Benjamin, J., 2015. Fifth Harmony Step Up as New-Age Feminist Icons in "Worth It" Video. [Online]
Available at: http://www.fuse.tv/videos/2015/03/fifth-harmony-worth-it-video-kid-ink
[Accessed 02 01 2016].

Holloway, L., 2014. Music Videos Slammed for Negative Portrayal of Black Women. [Online]
Available at: http://www.theroot.com/articles/culture/2014/08/music_videos_condemned_for_portraying_black_women_as_wild_and_hypersexual.html
[Accessed 01 01 2016].

Wikepdians, n.d. Milkshake (song). [Online]
Available at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milkshake_(song)
[Accessed 30 12 2015].

Wikipedian, n.d. Anaconda (Nicki Minaj song). [Online]
Available at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anaconda_(Nicki_Minaj_song)
[Accessed 26 12 2015].

Wikipedians, n.d. Blurred Lines. [Online]
Available at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blurred_Lines
[Accessed 02 01 2016].

Wikipedians, n.d. Booty (song). [Online]
Available at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Booty_(song)
[Accessed 03 01 2016].

Wikipedians, n.d. Can't Get You Out of My Head. [Online]
Available at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Can%27t_Get_You_Out_of_My_Head
[Accessed 30 12 2015].

Wikipedians, n.d. I Am Woman. [Online]
Available at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I_Am_Woman
[Accessed 30 12 2015].

Wikipedians, n.d. Thong Song. [Online]
[Accessed 30 12 2015].

Wikipedians, n.d. Worth it (Fifth Harmony Song). [Online]
Available at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Worth_It_(Fifth_Harmony_song)
[Accessed 02 01 2016].

 

Article in a Periodical

Beaudoin, K., 2015. 17 Times Nicki Minaj Perfectly Shut Down Sexism. Music.Mic, 03 April.

Brodesser-Akner, T., 2014. Nicki Minaj: Cheeky Genius. GQ, 19 October.

Empire, K. et al., 2013. Miley Cyrus: does the music business exploit women?. The Guardian, 7 October.

Garber-Paul, E., 2014. Jessie J: Why 'Bang Bang' Is a Song Young Women Need to Hear. Rolling Stone, 8 August.

Gould, G., 2013. If Miley Cyrus and Beyoncé want to be feminist, they need to quit the celebrity machine. The Guardian, 23 December.

Koehler, S., 2013. From the Mouths of Rapists: The Lyrics of Robin Thicke’s 'Blurred Lines'. Pacific Standard, 19 September.

Kritselis, A., 2014. Is "Bang Bang" by Jessie J, Ariana Grande, & Nicki Minaj a Feminist Anthem?. Bustle, 4 August.

Lynskey, D., 2013. Blurred Lines: the most controversial song of the decade. The Guardian, 13 November.

Machokoto, E., 2014. “Who Runs the World…Girls!” (Beyoncé) Feminist or Not?. OSISA, 10 January.

music, G., 2014. Sexism and racism permeate music videos, according to new report. The Guardian, 8 August.

Rogers, J., 2013. Girls allowed? The women on top in the music industry. The Guardian, 26 October.

Sat, L., 2015. Turn Down for Oxford: Rap legend speaks to Oxford Guild. Flex Mag, 14 May.

Topping, A., 2011. Adele can change how music industry markets female acts, says label boss. The Guardian, 29 May.

 

Books

Borelli, B., 2014. The Oxford Handbook of Dance And The Popular Screen. New York : s.n.

Gunter, B., 2002. Media Sex- What are the Issues?. s.l.:Lawrence Elbaun Associates, Inc..

Lieb, K., 2013. Gender, Branding, and the Modern Music Industry: The Social Construction of Female Popular Music Stars. s.l.:s.n.

McRobbie, A., 2009. The Aftermath of Feminism: Gender, Culture and Social Change. London: SAGE.

Railton, D. & Watson, P., 2011. Music Video and the Politics of Representation. s.l.:Edinburgh University Press.

Shuker, R., 2001. Understanding Popular Music. London: Routledge.

Thornham, S., 2007. Women, Feminism and Media. s.l.:s.n.

 

Interviews

Minaj, N., 2014. Nicki Minaj Talks About “Anaconda,” Beyonce, “Bang Bang,” & More! [Interview] (4 August 2014).

Nash, K., 2013. The Music Industry Discriminates Against Women [Interview] (24 April 2013).

T. & T., 2010. Feminism and Gender Roles [Interview] (17 March 2010).

 


 

 

 

 




[[1]] (Wikipedian, n.d.)
[[2]] ibid
[[3]] ibid
[[4]] (Beaudoin, 2015)
[[5]] (Brodesser-Akner, 2014)
[[6]] (Beaudoin, 2015)
[[7]] (Wikipedians, n.d.)
[[8]] (Anon., 2014)
[[9]] (Wikipedians, n.d.)
[[10]] (Wikipedians, n.d.)
[[11]] (Railton & Watson, 2005)
[[12]]  (Wikepdians, n.d.)
[[13]] (Railton & Watson, 2011)
[[14]] (Shuker, 2001)
[[15]] (Railton & Watson, 2011)
[[16]] (Shuker, 2001)
[[17]] (Holloway, 2014)
[[18]] (Jennifer Stevens Aubrey, 2011)
[[19]] (Machokoto, 2014)
[[20]] (Empire, et al., 2013)
[[21]] ibid
[[22]] ibid
[[23]] ( Weitzer & Kubrin, 2009)
[[24]] (Family, 1996)
[[25]] (Topping, 2011)
[[26]]  (music, 2014)
[[27]] (Wikipedians, n.d.)
[[28]] (Koehler, 2013)
[[29]] ( Weitzer & Kubrin, 2009)
[[30]]  ibid
[[31]] ibid
[[32]] (Jennifer Stevens Aubrey, 2011)
[[33]] (Gunter, 2002)
[[34]] ( Weitzer & Kubrin, 2009)
[[35]] (Holloway, 2014)
[[36]] (Wallis, 2011)
[[37]] (Lieb, 2013)
[[38]] (Holloway, 2014)
[[39]] (Wikipedians, n.d.)
[[40]] ibid
[[41]] (Jennifer Stevens Aubrey, 2011)
[[42]] ibid
[[43]] (Kritselis, 2014)
[[44]] (Beaudoin, 2015)
[[45]] (Wikipedians, n.d.)
[[46]] (Benjamin, 2015)
[[47]]  ibid
[[48]] (Gunter, 2002)
[[49]] (Thornham, 2007)
[[50]] (Wallis, 2011)
[[51]] ibid
[[52]] (Railton & Watson, 2011)

Friday, 11 December 2015

Critical Investigation tutorial 11/12/15

Essay plan



Intro: Written English needs to improve – grammatically incorrect in places. In general, the argument is laid out but it bounces between the two sides too much. Look to rewrite this with more clarity, exploring the two sides without veering from one to the other. The opening sentence or two definitely needs to be extremely clear and punchy. It might be worth bringing in your secondary texts too. Word count: 250 words.



Section 1: Primary text, textual analysis. Mainly focusing on film language and connotations of the video. Include aspects that could be read as empowering. Perhaps use preferred/oppositional readings? (Hall). 500 words.



Section 2: Historical context, textual analysis of historical texts. Explore how the issue has developed over the last 15 years or so. Perhaps consider reversing the order to work chronologically which would show the ‘degradation’ of standards (or more positively, the liberalisation of the media). Perhaps consider bringing your section on genre into this bit too. 450 words.



Section 3: Wider institutional context – these representations are overwhelmingly created by men. E.g. Robin Thicke. Maybe bring in Dyer – stereotyping and power. Feminist theory. Blog articles bemoaning these representations. The proliferation of ‘rape culture’. Bring in the later section in your plan regarding women being pressured. 400 words.



Section 4: The other side of the wider context argument – that women are empowered by their sexuality. Angela McRobbie – feminist theorist. Look her up. Also includes secondary texts and textual analysis. Discussion of power and the definition of power in 2015. 400 words.



Section 5: The future of this debate – women in music industry/music video. Perhaps bring in some new/digital media… for example, are music videos even particularly relevant now? Perhaps look at post-feminism and the use of new technology to push the latest wave of feminism. 300 words.



Conclusion: Sum up the argument, return to your opening paragraph and resolve debate to some extent. 100 words.



Next steps… update/finish your plan based on this tutorial. You don’t need to stick to the above by any means but hopefully it has at least clarified your thinking and provided a potential structure that will be easy to follow.





This essay has great potential – the addition of feminist research and theory will be particularly useful and you’ll find lessons after Christmas help with this too.



NEXT STEPS:

-Improve introduction
-Restructure my essay plan
-Do my critical investigation in the holidays

Thursday, 19 November 2015

TASK #1 TEXTUAL ANALYSIS

Nicki Minaj- Anaconda

 3:03- 3:23

During this scene, Nicki Minaj puts more emphasis on the fact that she is sexualising herself and making herself look seductive. She is seen in a kitchen at first as she holds a banana which then turns to her eating a strawberry with whipped cream. At the moment, the video is slowed down and Nicki Minaj's facial expressions suggests that she is trying to be seductive whilst eating the strawberry. The scene then quickly changes to her on the floor ,with other dancing members, humping the air repetitively which definitely conveys the meaning of sex. She is wearing revealing attire and she is staring directly at the camera as if to show that she is confident and has no problem with the movements she is doing. The fact that all the girls around her are black enhances the theories that black African American women are degraded in hip-hop music videos. The scene then suddenly changes back to where the setting is in a kitchen. Nicki is wearing a apron and has whipped cream all over her chest indicating to the audience to focus on that area on her body. The clip then increases in speed as scene continuously changes from her with whipped cream everywhere, to a banana rapidly turning to her in the kitchen as it revolves whilst she twerks. She then whips cream of her mouth while giving the audience direct eye contact. Also, she is seen putting whipped cream on her butt to indicate another part of her body that she wants the audience to focus on. She then tries to eat the banana whole, but then cuts it with a knife and the scene ends with her throwing it away. The speed between the 20 seconds of the music video is very fast moving and a lot of movement is seen. This is to shock the audience and give them the feeling of her twerking rapidly. A key point about this is that, in the kitchen scene, she is wearing a sort of maid apron as she stands by the table with fruits on. In a sense, this could suggest that women are normally in the kitchen, doing what they should do however she represents this in a seducing and silly way potentially insisting on being portrayed as a typical women but with sexual features as she continuously puts emphasis on her chest and butt. Although, it can be interpreted about Nicki asserting her power, not as a sexual object but a sexual subject. This part of the music video shows that it is targeted for men which shows that the male gaze (Mulvey) is in action. It can therefore be said that the way women are represented can affect the audience, (especially the younger audience) and how they act because they will see scenes like this and think it is normal to accentuate body features and to act sexual. This links to the hypodermic needle model as  Nicki Minaj, injects her views and values on to her audience. From a Marxist point of view, the media is in a way giving us an illusion of autonomy and false consciousness as we are indirectly forced to follow the status quo as we see these sort of videos and view now as normal compared to a decade ago, where it would be a shock to see such explicit content and would cause a moral panic (Cohen) as people would find this a threat to society as women in music videos are portrayed in such a way that parents do not want their children to imitate such actions. .


3:32- 4:32

This scene shows the values that Nicki Minaj has as she indicates to the audience that having a big butt is more important than anything else especially for men as she twerks on drake, who is in the R&B genre as well. Nicki Minaj is dressed in manner that links to the sexual theme of her music video as she wears lace tights that accentuates her butt and figure. There is low-key lighting when Nicki dances on Drake and this is done to create a seductive and mysterious atmosphere. There are lights flashed on them throughout the scene as if they're in hiding and people are looking for them which adds to the suspense of the scene. The scene changes to another setting to wear Nicki is lying in a small pool of water and is wearing a pink bathing suit. It is shown in a high angle shot so that her butt is clearly shown. The minute of this scene switches from the setting where she is with Drake and the setting of her in the pool continually. Once, it goes back to her in drake, she starts seductively touching him up and then twerks for him and at that exact moment the video slows down so as to show the movement she makes with her butt. The setting once again goes back to her in the pool and it is here where we hear the disturbing lyrics where she says "F*** the skinny b*****s!". Here, she insults skinny girls as she wants to see her "b****** with a fat a**". This gives of a negative portrayal that women should only care about their physical appearance and the size of their butts. It degrades women and gives a negative view for girls who are skinny as they will begin to feel uncomfortable as Nicki gives the idea to society that girls with big butts are more attractive. After that, Nicki is seen getting on Drake to the point where she is sitting on his lap and begins to violently and quickly twerk on him while Drake sits there staring at her butt in amazement and touches it as well. This part shows the masculinity view as drake suggests that men should be more intrigued by women who have big butts and would willingly do sexual activities with them. It can be argued that Nicki Minaj is trying to assert power in this scene as Drake sits down helplessly as Nicki Minaj confidently flaunts herself around him. She then removes his hand from her butt to show she is in control of her body and walks away. This scene gives of the portrayal that women are confidently sexualising themselves however, the audience will view this as women being considered as sex objects due to the stereotype that society has for women.

Wednesday, 18 November 2015

Notes and quotes tutorial

Notes & Quotes document over 8,000 words – incredible! However, this has probably revealed that we need to change our research technique slightly and be more selective of the material that goes into the N&Q document. In fact, I’d go through what you’ve got so far and try to cut it down to just highly relevant, short quotes that may end up in your final essay. Entire interviews, for example, should be just there in one or two quotes rather than a huge block of text.

Textual analysis looking like a strength already but definitely need to add to complete Task #1. Go back to this today/tomorrow and be specific about the key scene/point in the video you are analysing and offer huge detail in terms of media language.

Brilliant to see so many secondary texts analysed too. For the next task (historical context) you may want to go back to one of those videos you’ve looked at already and go into more detail.

Academic books/journals is the key area to focus on now – only two currently. Look at our archive of journal articles on the M: drive – plenty of relevant stuff here (at least 6-7 PDFs for sure).

There are a couple of books on the shelf in DF07 regarding music video and gender representation – these will be critical texts for your research. One is Music video and politics of representation – look it up.

Widen your search away from music video and look at feminism and the representation of women more generally. This will create far more opportunities for academic book and journal research and media theory.

I’d keep looking for internet-based research – quite a few links so far, but this should be more like 20+ by the end of the process. The Guardian is a great starting point.

Task #1 – you’ve already done some textual analysis of your primary text but you definitely need to add more.

Task #2 – bibliography needs to be a priority over the next week but you have no concerns… if anything your problem will be too much research!

Copy this into a new blog post and write below your next three steps in your research.
 
  1. Finish my textual analysis for Friday
  2. Reduce the amount of research I have so that I only have the key points
  3. Start my bibliography and find more academic books to research on

Monday, 9 November 2015

Media Magazine conference - follow-up

What Has the Internet Ever Done for Me?

-Bill Thompson


-The internet is the basis for daily interactions
-1/10 children in Indonesia have no  idea how the internet works, they use Facebook and are able to access it but they have no idea how they are using the internet.
-Facebook sits and relies on the internet
-Local authority are able to access data; arguable is this controversial? Should they be allowed to view what we process though
-The internet is permissive; it allows us to be free minded and say what we want to, we are more free
-We are still at the point where the underlined network can get in the way
-Ways we use the net: connection, information, voices in your head, political action, caritas & campaigning, financial reward, games, learning, friendship...
(candy crush was sold for £5.9 billion)
- Downside: bullying, unwanted porn, images of child sexual abuse, extremism, abuse, scams and rip offs, fraud, conspiracy theories...
-"The network is paid to be done"
-The internet has given all these possibilities
-Given all the possibilities, that is what essentially makes up the internet whether they are positive or negative-The internet is something hard to control; unless you know what the software does/works, you can't control it

Media Power and Life After Leveson

-Professor Natalie Fenton


-Phone hacking in 2011 done by the news of the world was something that changed media. Cameron had called a public inquiry
-"never was simply about journalists behaving badly; it was and is about power"

MEDIA POWER

Power cover...
-Media content?
-Audiences?
-Journalists?
-Governments?

Power to...
-Censor?
-Mislead?
-Set the agenda?

-There is a lot of power over media content
-Mediated democracy we live in-where the government is scared how they are portrayed by the mainstream media
-In the last three decade we have seen a massive explosion o news platforms &news being free
-Entanglement of media & political elites
-The government can try & imitate the media
-"Social media will bring social change"
-The news industries are 'monstoring' us
-Example of news industries monstoring us- Chris Jefferies- accused of murder- press admitted they had no proof. They wrecked a person's life just for the sales.
-The news industries say to government- "challenge us if you dare" because they have much more readership obviously what they say can shape a view on the government.
-Since 1979 no government has been elected without Rupert Murdoch's help. Because articles relate to the government which he would want to be in power.
-Vote Cameron, get Murdoch.
-over 50% of newspapers are controlled by Rupert Murdoch. (National Newspapers)

-Stuart Hall: The role of the media in circulating 'common sense'. Media processes are over representing some and under representing some. This leads to asymmetry between elite people.
-BlackLivesMatter #EricGarner- difference in being a civil activist in 1960's to 2015
-Twitter is good for getting people involved- although social media has become a place for harassment, racism and abuse.
-Social media has become a surveillance


The Media, Democracy and Politics

-Owen Jones

-Just last years million of people in the UK were driven to food banks.
-The richest 100 people have doubled their wealth in the past year.
-The youth service are being cut
-1/4 people in London grow up in overcrowded homes.
-The government are ruining our lives

-Media is the pillar for democracy
-There are many barriers in journalism
-1/2 of top 100 journalists are educated; 7% went to private school, 14% went to a comprehensive school
-Its as if they can't understand issues of other people in other positions.
-Narrow social backgrounds

-There needs to be a bigger fuller diversity
-"Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and it never will"- Frederick Douglass
-Social media is important- the sun- 3 million copies were bought in 2010, now only 1.8 million
-New channels are doing okay, they are surviving NDM
-Citizen journalism, especially on twitter has led to more real time topics, mainstream media has regulations

-There has become a much more diverse and alternation view points and opinions.
-Demonetization of the working class
-No class in Britain, just middle class
-Wealthiest people can afford to pay tax. 'class worrier'
-Low paid worker, in work on benefits cuts

-Powerful people are those who are responsible.
-The media distort the world, don't scrutinize the powerful
-Media is not accurate, representation of society is not true.